9 . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair for the offender plus the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

Case legislation is specific on the jurisdiction in which it absolutely was rendered. For illustration, a ruling in a very California appellate court would not commonly be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this can be a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; When the parents on the boy or Female do not approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they will do if they're able to Reduce off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this kind of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man that is a major, the pair is neither harassed by anybody nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who provides these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against these types of person(s) as provided by regulation.

This ruling has conditions, and For the reason that petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based about the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances from the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 from the Constitution. Read more

184 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as established forth would not implement, as the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, rather he has become acquitted of the criminal charges based on evidence and it's properly-settled law that once the civil servant is acquitted inside the criminal case, then on this quite charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment via the department and held him disqualified to the post because acquittal for all upcoming purposes. The aforesaid proposition continues to be set at naught with the Supreme Court of Pakistan within the case in the District Police Officer Mainwali and a pair of others v.

For your foregoing reasons the instant suit is dismissed with no order regarding cost. Office to prepare decree in the above terms. Read more

116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice of the Peace u/s 22-A is just not obliged to afford a chance of hearing into click here the accused party; nor obliged to always or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to take into account all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a lot of the relevant factors. Read more

The court system is then tasked with interpreting the regulation when it can be unclear the way it relates to any presented situation, usually rendering judgments based around the intent of lawmakers plus the circumstances of your case at hand. These types of decisions become a guide for long run similar cases.

On June sixteen, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf from the boy by a guardian advertisement litem, against DCFS, the social worker, plus the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf of the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advert litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court to get a dismissal based on absolute immunity, since they were all acting in their Employment with DCFS.

Binding Precedent – A rule or principle set up by a court, which other courts are obligated to adhere to.

twelve . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair on the offender as well as Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.

In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe as a foster child. Although the pair had two younger children of their possess at home, the social worker didn't explain to them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report to the court the following day, the worker reported the boy’s placement within the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the few experienced younger children.

17 . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have read the figured out counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard for the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) of your Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession in the subjected premises for the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer during the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this factor for interim custody of the subject premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, it is also a effectively-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic for the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings about the evidence.